As retiring For-Profit faculty member Michael Seiden states: Why do you think the author wrote this text. Students at nonprofits also have the additional security that they are attending an accredited institution.
In the words of the report Subprime Opportunity, published by the Educational Trust funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation"for-profit colleges provide high cost degree programs that have little chance of leading to high-paying careers, and saddle the most vulnerable students with heavy debt.
Traditionally, College degrees are awarded by the many State and Community colleges that provide accredited and time-tested programs. He does not back up his claim as completely as his others and does not fully explain how the government regulating loans more heavily would prevent the current abuses surrounding financial aid.
Yes it does, but for some reason gun advocates think that the right to bear arms is the only constitutional right that is virtually without limit. The program, she later learned, was not approved by the Illinois Department of Public Health and no reputable hospitals or nursing homes would hire her" Quigley On a cost-benefit analysis, the data suggests that attending for-profit institutions are profitable only for the people running the school, not for the students.
If that were true, then how come it never happens. On the surface, it may very well seem that "for-profits exist in large part to fix educational market failures left by traditional institutions, and they profit by serving students that public and private nonprofit institutions too often ignore" Carey Why do you think the author wrote this text.
Given that these schools are money-making institutions, they have the interests of their bottom lines at heart, not the interests of those whom they are supposed to be educating, in contrast to a nonprofit institution.
But there are two responses to this claim: What seems to be his main argument. Make me take my shoes off before getting on a plane, just because some idiot tried to blow up his sneakers.
However, unlike her for-profit counterparts, an NYU graduate will at least have a marketable degree.
Both occurred around the same time, and were fueled in part by changes in government policies Thompson Every time another tragedy like this occurs, gun advocates make the same arguments about why we can't possibly do anything to restrict the weaponization of our culture.
Political and cultural biases are both in this article. There are parallels between the housing boom and the boom in attendance at for-profit institutions.
If only they'd have the guts to say it. There are parallels between the housing boom and the boom in attendance at for-profit institutions. The government alleged that the company enrolled students who were unable to read their applications, were visibly on drugs when signing up, or who did not have a computer, even though they were actually registering for a purely virtual institution Lewin Discuss one rhetorical strategy the author uses to persuade his audience, and one strength or weakness in the argument.
They default on their loans at about twice the rate of students at public colleges and universities and three times the rate of students at private ones.
These loans will follow her for the rest of her life given that "federal bankruptcy law makes it nearly impossible to discharge student loan debts" Lieber What are three of his main claims.
People get angry and upset everywhere in the world. But there are two responses to this claim: After finding and analyzing the claims provided by Carey, I would like to investigate the real result of receiving a degree from a For-Profit, and what it can entail for a graduate in the modern job market.
Why the latest mass shooting yet again proves gun advocates wrong. Indeed they are, but so are a lot of things, and that tells us nothing about whether they're good or bad and how we want to treat them going forward.
I feel that Carey could of have had some more sources for his article, even though he had opinions from both sides of the argument. The people who say this are the same ones who fight to make sure that existing laws are as weak and ineffectual as possible.
Iscuss the points brought up by the writers, and what do you think is the propose for writing these articles? The purpose of the essay is to demonstrate your understanding of the larger conversation and your ambitious critical thinking on the ideas presented in the range of readings.
Why do libs dispute my ability to relay to them what makes soldiers angry, it's like no matter how many troops I say died, they don't listen?
Best answer: Many from Vietnam came back and protested the war, they were very patriotic. For-profit educational institutions, particularly universities and other institutions of vocational and higher learning, have seen enormous, “almost exponential” growth in recent years.
The National Center for Education Statistics estimates that from –99 to –09, the number of. "hy do you think they are called for-profit colleges:" The big business of (not) educating students 'You need a college degree.' This is the conventional wisdom articulated in today's society, where job prospects remain scarce, despite the softening economy.
Why Do You Think They're Called For-Profit Colleges? Graduated from Binghamton University and Ohio State University Director of the education policy program at the New America Foundation.
Jul 25, · The for-profit Kaplan University recently struck a deal with the California community-college system to provide courses that the bankrupt public colleges olivierlile.com: Kevin Carey.Why do you think theyre called for profit colleges essay